Posts Tagged ‘demand’

Creating a Customer Centric Supply Chain

This article, by our own Linda Whitaker, was published in RIS News»

As retailers seek out new business tactics to lure back the customers they lost during the recession, they will find that one of the most profitable strategies is creating a customer-centric supply chain.

However, one reality retailers must face is that the recession has created a new consumer paradigm. According to a new report by PricewaterhouseCoopers and Retail Forward, entitled “The New Consumer Behavior Paradigm: Permanent or Fleeting,” customers will not bounce back to their old shopping habits, as “seventy-two percent of all shoppers recently indicated that their shopping behavior has changed significantly or somewhat as a result of the economic environment”. The report suggests that shoppers will be more deliberate and purposeful in their spending, giving way to a more practical consumerism. However, it also predicts that these shopper behaviors may change as the recession eases.

Since we know no one can foretell the future to know exactly how and when behaviors will change, our take on this study is that consumer behaviors have changed and will continue to change, and that retailers need to actively seek new ways to engage them (especially the younger generations), and be ready to continually adjust their product mix accordingly.

With this new paradigm in mind, retailers must take a step back from their businesses to understand how to engage today’s new consumer.

Some questions that retailers should ask themselves:

What are your customers looking for when they walk into the store? Why are they buying that item? Does their buying strategy map to the one you have for the product? What are they not buying? How much are they buying? How often are they buying? Are they buying it at the same store?

To fulfill changing customer demand in your supply chain, you have to start at the store, and it comes down to the two basics: breadth and depth.

What and Where:

There are the tried and true ideas behind why customers select a certain product (the customer product strategy) when supporting customer demand: Price, impulse buys, destination items, etc. But customers today have a huge wealth of information at hand when deciding what to buy, and therefore they can include many new inputs (as well as the tried and true). These customer demand choices indicate their product preferences, and will be inputs into the customer buying strategy, and hence need to be included in your product strategy.

Preferential signals (Inputs to the customer strategy): Price, convenience, fashion-forward, technological, locally made, organic/sustainable, ethical, necessity, value, quality, size, color, style, brand, culture.

Ideally, you have a host of customer data that lets you not only map customers to purchases, but also link the changing customer buying strategy with your product strategy, and this may be different by location. If you do not have customer transaction and purchase information, you can use product/store level demand as a proxy, perhaps supported with market data. It will be important in this changing environment that these product/location strategies are continually monitored and updated.

Once you can assign the product strategy at a location level, you can tackle the breadth issue, i.e. the assortment. Most retailers cannot operationally manage unique store level assortments, and need to assign clusters that are often constrained. Care, supported by process, timely information, and optimal systems are needed to manage the conflicts between desired ranges, and operational constraints: space, fixtures, and assortment planning groups.

How Much and When:

When you assign a strategy to a product/location to drive assortment decisions, this same strategy should be used to drive depth. For example, a key destination item may need a very high service level so that your customer will not be disappointed.

In order to best meet these strategies and keep inventory performance high, the time phased aspects of the local customer demand need to be taken into account:

Circumstantial signals: The time of day or week activity occurs, holidays, local events and promotions, sports schedules, weather, seasonality and regional demand.

Putting it all Together

Retailers need to have the ability to assess and continually change with the patterns at each store based on the local signals and behaviors of their customers. In order to increase margin, achieve proper stock levels and align assortments with customer demand, top down simplifications in the inventory planning process must be removed.

Stores that can quickly process customer behavior and turn it into inventory execution will have an immense advantage in today’s marketplace. This means creating a dynamic inventory plan that is highly reactive to local demand fluctuations, allowing the retailer to be flexible and respond to how their customers are behaving now. This enables the customer to have product available when and where they want it, in the right size, the right color, and the right style at every store and in every channel.

Linda Whitaker, Chief Scientist, Quantum Retail, is one of the leading practitioners of retail science in the country. She provides the research, innovation and advanced science for Quantum Retail’s solutions. Prior to co-founding Quantum Retail, Linda spent the past 17 years developing optimization and scientific solutions for complex retail problems in replenishment, logistics, pricing, promotion and consumer behavior at Retek Inc. and HNC.

The Profit Lab: Demand, Demand, Demand

THE PROFIT LAB // Top 10 Ways to Pull Profit from Allocation

Strategy #1: Understand your demand to achieve better allocations

The conventional allocation process allows you to select a base of historical data to either use as a base of allocating, or to create a plan to allocate into. The assumption is that the data will reflect the way products behaved in those stores and that the pattern will repeat itself.

The true objective is to fulfill as many of the customer expectations regarding the allocated product in a given location as possible. Unfortunately historical sales fail to represent those customer expectations. This is because sales have been limited by the amount of inventory a store received. When a customer wants to buy an item and it’s not there, it’s a lost sale. We typically refer to the customers’ expectation as demand. The difference between demand and actual sales is lost sales.

If we are to do a better job of fulfilling the customer expectations, we have to allocate to demand rather than sales. If we don’t, we’re invariably creating self-fulfilling prophecies. If sales is less than demand we’ll only fill back to sales potential rather than demand potential. We’ll never capture the demand. The result… missed opportunities!

What you can do now

The key to understanding demand is accounting for situations where demand is missed. When products run out of stock there is exposure to missing sales opportunity. Short of creating complex logic to accurately assess missed opportunities, some pre-analysis of your data may lead to quick improvements.

When selecting your base of history, take a look at situations where stores reached 0 inventories. If you’re looking at a group of items, look for unexpectedly low store level inventories. Limit the time period you’re referencing to a range where low or out of stock situations haven’t had a chance to become relevant. While you may miss some trending by doing this, you’ll almost always improve the understanding of relative store selling and thus improve your allocation results.

What you should consider

If you’re considering investing in new allocation capabilities, insist on – no demand, demand! Without understanding demand you’ll consistently miss opportunities to improve your allocation results and therefore your company’s results.

All demand is not created equal. If an incorrect plan or forecast is used to derive demand when you have stock out situations, the result can be even worse than not using demand at all!

The best modern allocation systems have the ability to not only create a forecast to fill in demand, but to evaluate the quality of the forecast across multiple dimensions of merchandise and location using the most current data BEFORE using it to derive demand.

We’ll be taking a closer look at forecasting related to fashion allocation later in this series.

<< Previous post in series | Next post in series >>

Learn more

Follow this series to learn all 10 strategies for improving allocation. We will be deconstructing the allocation process and exploring opportunities to improve within your current allocation processes and technology limitations. We will also review key areas to think about if you are considering investing in improved allocation capabilities.

Download this blog as a PDF»

Subscribe to receive weekly updates of this series HERE»

For resources on allocation, visit: http://quantumretail.com/solutions/allocation-replenishment/resources

1 person likes this post.

The truth about size optimization, SKU rationalization and localization

Getting the right sizes, colors, styles and quantities to the right location

Local demand changes at every store on a daily basis. Clustering stores together by store size and geography might simplify the process, but is inefficient and does not take into consideration individual store patterns for size, color, style and quantity of local demand and product preference.  Retailers need to monitor the changing demand at every store to align their assortment in the way that is most profitable and aligned to their strategic objectives.

It sounds like a no-brainer, but when supply chains become complex, retailers cannot keep up with store level demand and will send the same amounts of every product to similar store types. However, localization of store level assortments and order plans is proven to increase availability, full price sales and customer satisfaction. It is also proven to reduce overall inventory, wastage and markdowns which all erode margin.

Optimizing sizes and rationalizing SKUs

In order to optimize sizes and rationalize SKUs at a store level you need an acute awareness of product behavior. It does not make sense to only optimize on size – if a retailer is going to take the time to assess sales and demand at a store-by-store level, they should rationalize SKUs at a local level by using store data.

There are dozens of product behaviors unique to every store. In order to analyze these behaviors and make the most of their efforts, retailers should optimize by style, color, brand, promotion, price, and seasonality at each store. But the complexity of this exercise can become time consuming when a supply chain is vast.

There are however, technologies available that can simplify this process and make it ongoing, creating a strategy for these attributes and applying it to all levels of inventory management, from order planning, allocation, replenishment, forecasting and distribution.

The concept of localization works on two levels:

  1. Retailers can look at the unique behaviors of every product – to determine each stores’ selling patterns for size, color, style, quantity, brand, season, etc. With this understanding, a retailer can plan orders on a store by store basis to deliver the right amount of the products that customers are buying at each location, allowing the retailer to achieve the highest turn rates, reduce inventory to the appropriate levels, reduce over stocking and stock outs and ultimately increase margin. The second concept of localization comes from localizing distribution and utilizing vendors that produce products in the vicinity of each store. This type of localization is most easily applied to fresh foods and markets – where customers prefer to support their local farmers and local brands.
  2. When retailers realize that they cannot optimize sizes and packs unless they have an awareness of store demand, stock outs, and customer behavior at the local level, they quickly become more profitable and able to compete in today’s retail market.

Q – the quickest and most profitable solution for size optimization, SKU rationalization and localization

The Q system continuously monitors business strategies, profitability, service levels, stock levels and 35 different aspects of behavior for every product in every store. Q is so intelligent that it learns from data like stock outs, lost sales, slow movers, lumpy sellers, packs, sizes, colors and styles. It takes the most recent data for each item and automatically recommends inventory movement decisions driving toward your corporate objectives. Plus, it optimizes the way you phase in a new product and phase out another – ensuring that you are always reaching your optimal performance, sales and service levels, giving you the highest return on the inventory you are buying.

CLICK HERE for more information on Q

Get resources on how to adapt to the challenges of today’s retail market HERE »

Download this blog as a PDF

Forecasting For Success

Forecasting is a tricky business, retailers lose money every time a demand forecast is inaccurate. Sophisticated software is necessary to ensure that customer demand and in-stock products are a perfect match.

Dori Saltzman, RIS News – April 2 2007 – Forecasting is a tricky business, retailers lose money every time a demand forecast is inaccurate. Sophisticated software is necessary to ensure that customer demand and in-stock products are a perfect match.

The Guitar Center chose Quantum Retail’s Q forecasting software to help it get a handle on the “fashion-based, choppy demand” of its higher-priced merchandise. Early indications are positive: though Q is currently forecasting only 50 percent of the inventory — representing the vast majority of sales dollars — the forecasts it generates are 20 percent better than before, according to Irene Messier, executive over inventory management.

Prior to implementing Q, the Guitar Center used two separate forecasting systems. One, an automated replenishment system, was used solely on the less expensive, high velocity items — the so-called “sticks and strings.” A manual, excel-based system was used on the more expensive, slow moving items — such as $700 guitars.

The Guitar Center selected Quantum Retail to provide a system to handle both types of inventory. “We were looking for something that gave us better forecast outcome (on the slow moving items) and also hoping to find a solution that could be utilized in updating our auto-replenishment product as well,” says Messier. The Guitar Center upgraded its forecasting methods after identifying a need for greater demand accuracy for the slow-moving items. “One of the factors in a situation where you’re dealing with Excel-based forecasting is that the level of accuracy, due to the amount of information that needs to be processed, isn’t going to be nearly as accurate as using a statistics-based forecasting model,” says John Zavada, executive vice president and CIO.

The $700 guitar is the quintessential high-priced, slow moving product for which accurate forecasts are vital. Guitar Center stores risk unbalanced assortments and lost sales if forecasts are off.

In order to determine that Q could generate accurate forecasts for both the high priced and high velocity items, the Guitar Center ran a six-month pilot before rolling out the system live on the higher priced inventory. The pilot was run on a sub-section of the products. “We observed consistent month after month, better forecasting coming out of the Q application,” says Messier.

About Quantum Retail Technology, Inc.

Quantum Retail answers the new questions facing retailers with a merchandise optimization suite designed for the increasing pace and complexity of the consumer revolution and today’s competitive landscape. Quantum Retail’s solutions solve the most difficult and costly problems retailers face – quickly and permanently. Our Q solution is the answer for: Forecasting and Order Planning – Replenishment and Allocation – Assortment and Range Planning.