Posts Tagged ‘Chris Allan’

2011 Retail Analyst Predictions, Part 6: Matthew Fassler, Goldman Sachs

Matthew Fassler, Goldman Sachs analyst, discusses retail outlook in the specialty sectors.

Best Buy announces strategic growth strategy

According to a Feb. 22 Alacra Pulse article, Fassler had a neutral rating of Best Buy and trimmed his price target to $38 from $39, but said the company announced a series of changes to store opening plans, as well as other minor restructuring moves, that he believes will result in a more streamlined growth strategy and in cost saving.

Fassler also notes that warranties may be helping Best Buy’s profitability where past sales are lacking, saying that Best Buy has not disclosed how much extended warranties contribute to its profits. Consumer electronics retailing is “historically a low-margin business that is dependent on extended warranties for profitability,” he said. “Perhaps extended warranties have become even more valuable to Best Buy recently, as its content businesses — like movies and music — have shrunk.”

The company plans to open 6 to 8 large-format stores in the U.S. and a total of 18 stores in the United Kingdom, Mexico and Canada in fiscal 2012. The International market continues to bring noteworthy prospects for the company along with financial growth for the stakeholders,” said the Alacra Pulse article.

Best Buy also announced it is closing its namesake stores in China and shifting new U.S. store growth to smaller formats instead of its familiar big boxes, said the Wall Street Journal. Best Buy said it would focus on growing in China under another retail format called Five Star that has proven more successful; it disclosed plans to open 40 to 50 additional Five Star stores in 2012.

As a result of the restructuring moves, Best Buy said it would incur charges of $225 million to $245 million over its next two fiscal years, diluting earnings. But it maintained that the moves would eventually result in an annual pre-tax savings of $60 million to $70 million by 2013, according to the Journal.

In today’s cutthroat retail environment, retailers are facing tough issues, not losing sight of the domestic front while expanding globally, restructuring their initiatives to a local focus, aligning with customer needs, and more. Technology Evaluation Center’s P.J. Jakovljevic discusses what retailers can do to stay competitive with Quantum Retail’s Chief Customer Officer, Chris Allan, here »

Radio Shack to put strategic focus on mobile

On a February 22 earnings call, Julian C. Day, Chairman and CEO of Radio Shack, stated that with his plans to retire, there are also significant changes in the market that make it an appropriate time for a leadership transition.

The first area he mentions is mobility, the area of Radio Shack’s business most subject to technological and strategic change. Day stated that they have been able to expand their presence in the mobility sector, moving from two to three carriers nationally, and re-fixturing stores to allow customers to have choice and product comparison. The company’s mobile sales were up 33% in 2010 on top of 25% in 2009.

Other major developments in the mobility area, has been a partnership with Target, in which they operate the postpaid wireless business on their behalf. “We look forward to growing with Target and we believe that partnering with additional high caliber retailers to enable them to get access to the high growth mobility sector, while improving our overall channel economics, makes sound strategic sense,” said Day.

The second major change in the company’s business has been the ongoing reallocation of space in stores for mobility and some signature categories such as power. Day explains that it made sense for them to allocate resources to this category and illustrates just how important the traditional merchant art of picking the right product for the channel can be even in declining segments.

The third and last major change for Radio Shack is the financial strength of the Company. From mid-2006 through mid-2010; Radio Shack built their cash position from less than $200 million to over $900 million.

Fassler noted that it sounds like T-Mobile struggles are part of their gross margin issue, and that it will probably persist. “But putting that aside, how should we think about the gross margin trajectory here?”

“You’re absolutely right, Matt, with the T-Mobile issue, and until we work through all the details on that, it will remain a part of the issue.” Day continued. “I think, our biggest gross margin rate opportunity continues to be, as we get better at driving some of these end products in personal electronics, and in modern home. We need to do a better job on our accessories.”

For the year, Radio Shack reported that gross profit increased $48 million to $2.01 billion, a margin rate of 45%, down 90 basis points on a year-over-year basis. In the quarter, gross profit was most negatively impacted by the disappointing performance in their T-Mobile business.

Mobility is expanding immensely. Along with increasing focus on sales of mobile devices, retailers need to have a plan for mobile commerce in their own business. Check out our Guide to Creating a Plan for Mobile Commerce, E-Commerce, and Social Media »

Office Max and office supply giants could be in a permanent slump

Threats are looming over the office supply giants, leaving analysts divided over whether or not the big three chains — Staples, OfficeMax, and Office Depot, are in a short-term slump or a permanent one.
Fassler expects the stock to fall in the wake of the tough new guidance, said CNN. However, in a research note, Fassler indicates that there is some promise in OfficeMax’s forecast. “Guidance to relatively resilient profitability in the face of lower sales, despite a levered model, does still speak to the profit opportunity at [OfficeMax],” Fassler wrote. Fassler remained neutral on the stock.

In a February note titled “Signs of Paradigm Shift,” Fassler announced that he was cutting the firm’s exposure to office supply stocks due to “secular headwinds to cyclical recovery.”

One of those headwinds is the rise in retail competition — one-stop mass merchants like Wal-Mart, Costco, and Target. Amazon is also an adversary — many of the products sold in the office retailers’ brick and mortar outlets are available online, which enables customers to comparison shop.

The other secular shift isn’t competitive, but behavioral: Paper usage is in decline, said CNN. This affects the contract, or delivery side of the superstores’ business. Staples, OfficeMax, and Office Depot derive about half of their revenues from those operations, which sell in bulk to other companies.

Paper itself isn’t hugely lucrative, but it does drive sales of other products — ink, staples, printers, etc. Consequently, its shrinking usage could pose a big problem for the superstores. In a survey of office supply purchasers at large companies, Goldman Sachs found that nearly half of the respondents expected their paper consumption to drop. Reasons range from environmental concerns to double-sided printing to the advent of mobile technology.

Borders bankruptcy filing puts Barnes & Noble in a good position

As part of the Chapter 11 process, Borders  will close 30% of its 642 stores, or about 200 that it identifies as underperforming. The bookseller operated twice that many at its peak in 2003, stated Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch.

The Ann Arbor, Mich. based company listed debt of $1.29 billion and assets of $1.28 billion at the end of 2010 in its bankruptcy filing.

Borders, according to the filing, owes tens of millions of dollars to various publishers, including $41 million to Penguin Putnam, $37 million to Hachette Book Group, and $34 million to Simon & Schuster.

Market Watch noted that by the time Borders embraced e-commerce in recent years, the competition had already established a firm lead. Rival and leading bookseller Barnes & Noble Inc. stands to be a big winner in light of the filing, according to the article.

Fassler upgraded Barnes & Noble to neutral from sell ahead of the filing.

Barnes & Noble shares moved fractionally higher to finish at $18.77, but have still lost more than 11% in the past year.

Home Depot sees continued improvement as Lowe’s moves into transition state

The Home Depot Inc. and Lowe’s Companies Inc. are two similar home renovation retailers that are going in different directions, stated the National Post. While the team at Home Depot has gelled after several years of evolution and is poised for new levels of profitability, Lowe’s is undergoing a transition with many senior executives retiring in recent months.

Fassler, has upgraded Home Depot to “buy” while upping the price target to US$42 from US$37, while downgrading Lowe’s to “neutral” maintaining a US$28 price target.

For Home Depot, Fassler forecasts continued improvement in same-store sales over the next two quarters, thanks to a new focus on home repair, remodeling and maintenance categories and less emphasis on appliances, which faces tough sales comparisons over last year.

As for Lowe’s, the company’s management has undergone substantial shuffling in the past few months, stated the Post.

After Lowe’s most recent analyst meeting, Fassler noted its biggest challenge is introducing truly new and innovative ideas. “There had been too much “redundancy” in the company’s strategy over a number of years,” he said.

What are your strategic goals? Surprisingly many retailers do not have strategic goals for their products. Learn how to build yours and you will dramatically increase your profit. Check out our guide to Creating Product Strategies »

AutoZone’s customer service is their key differentiator

In a March 1 earnings call, William Rhodes, Chairman of the Board, CEO and President, stated that AutoZone is very pleased to announce another very strong quarter of performance, both financially and operationally. “Our earnings per share for the second quarter increased by 35.8%, our best performance since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, and our domestic same-store sales increased 7.1%,” he continued. “This marks the ninth consecutive quarter of EPS growth in excess of 20% and the 18th consecutive quarter of double-digit EPS growth.”

Regarding their second quarter results, their Total Auto Parts segment, made up of both Domestic and Mexico businesses, delivered a 10.3% sales increase. Their other businesses, including E-Commerce, were up 11.2%. “There is no question that our industry is experiencing strong growth in both Retail and Commercial sectors, and our competitors have also reported solid growth trends,” stated Rhodes. “However, based on sales data provided to us through NPD, our share of both the Retail and Commercial businesses gained share for the quarter, and according to the detail, we gained share each month of the quarter, November, December, and January.”

Servicing the customer and providing the degree of trustworthy advice continues to be a key point of differentiation in the marketplace, according to Rhodes.

In response to Fassler, William Giles, CFO, EVP of IT, Finance, and Store Development, and Treasurer, agreed that if there were a scenario where their sales growth were to be a bit slower and all the other factors went their way, the incentive comp would remain close to current levels.

How can retailers continue to service their customers better? One way is with a focus on localizing their shopping experience. Download our free guide on The Art of Localizing Inventory »

SOURCES: CNN, Wall Street Journal Market Watch, Alacra Pulse, The National Pulse, Seeking Alpha

Download a PDF of the full series HERE»

Be the first to like.

Challenging the “Enterprise Apps Establishment” and Retailers’ Mindset – Part 2: Quantum’s Secret Sauce

Technology Evaluation Center’s P.J. Jakovljevic interviewed Quantum’s Chris Allan, Chief Customer Officer, for a two part blog series.

Part 1 of this blog series analyzed typical issues that retailers face in their cutthroat competitive environment and concluded that traditionally available packaged retail enterprise applications are sub-optimal, provide only stovepipe views, and demand constant manual intervention by a highly sophisticated user. This is especially true in the case of handling ever-more difficult products and assortments (e.g., big ticket slow-moving items, sized merchandise, etc.).

The article then introduced Quantum Retail Technology, an up-and-coming company with a budding install base, who has an intriguing mission and value proposition for retailers that have to deal with a slew of tricky retail items. What follows now is my discussion with Chris Allan, Quantum’s chief strategy officer.

Quantum’s Secret Sauce

PJ: What is your killer value proposition that other retail software “usual suspects” (e.g., Oracle, SAP, SAS, JDA, etc.) fail to provide? In other words, what are the pain points that only you can cure for your customers (and with what typical benefits)?

CA: The Q Platform (explained in Part 1) actually solves the problems that these other vendors mainly talk about solving–and delivers on the business case every time, with proven, measurable results. Quantum has developed the concept of managing by Merchandising Strategy–determining the role of the product within the customer offering, such as being an image item, loss leader, traffic driver, etc. (see Part 1 for more details).

Users are not asked to select from an overwhelming number of forecasting algorithms and replenishment algorithms, and to set a slew of tricky parameters up around each of those algorithms for every stock-keeping unit (SKU) in every store. Q takes the chosen Merchandising Strategy and understands the objectives of the product from both a financial and a merchandising perspective and ensures that every inventory decision that is made is aligned with achieving those objectives.

The way that customers buy product changes over time and Q adjusts automatically to react to those changes, ensuring that alignment is maintained throughout the products’ lifecycle. This is very different from having to actively maintain the ordering, allocation, and replenishment configurations for every SKU in every store and manually ensure that the system is set up correctly (which is the value prop of our aforementioned competitors)

In the process of understanding items Q considers over 30 dimensions of product behavior including average sales, maximum sales, demand, days between sales, lost sales, days between stock-outs, current inventory, last stock-out, weeks of supply, percent in stock, etc. Beyond these typical sales and inventory metrics, Q also understands the following:

  • When the issues happened, e.g. an out-of-stock on Monday has different gravity than out-of-stock on Saturday
  • Variations in contributing factors such as lead times, lifecycle, and customer service level
  • Variability and uniqueness in sales such as volatility, lumpiness, lost sales, demand vs. sales
  • Finally, and perhaps most importantly, profitability metrics such as gross margin return on inventory investment (GMROI)

These capabilities have led to retailers being able to have a high degree of automation  with Q using exception management to highlight only those areas where users should be spending time in the system. Typical results achieved and verified (by Quantum’s customers that were mentioned in Part 1) are as follows:

  • A 2.2 percent full-price sales increase (in fast fashion)
  • A 5.6 percent sales increase (in general merchandise)
  • A 4 percent increase in gross margin
  • An 11 percent inventory reduction
  • A 40 percent reduction in overstocks

Read more »

1 person likes this post.

Challenging the “Enterprise Apps Establishment” and Retailers’ Mindset – Part 1

Technology Evaluation Center’s P.J. Jakovljevic interviewed Quantum’s Chris Allan, Chief Customer Officer, for a two part blog series.

The current market dynamics demand that retailers do more with less while still zealously protecting their market share. They need to juggle a multiplicity of variables in terms of assortments that are finely tuned to local demographics, locations, and clusters of their stores and distribution centers, merchandize allocation and pricing, workforce levels, space planning, and so on and so forth in order to best align their business strategies with today’s ever more informed, empowered, and fickle consumer. Read more »

Be the first to like.

Chain Store Age Interviews Quantum Retail Technology’s Chris Allan

How the supply chain sector is changing and what retailers can do to stay competitive

Samantha Murphy, associate editor of Chain Store Age interviews Chris Allan, co-founder and chief customer officer, Quantum Retail

The increase in the ways retailers can reach out to customers has put a strain on existing forecasting and replenishment processes. In many cases, it is also increasing the inventory investment required to support the business, with each of the channels being operated semi-autonomously with little-to-no sharing of information or consistency of customer experience.

In order to maintain growth, many retailers are looking overseas, away from their congested home markets. This has led them into unfamiliar territory with new challenges and constraints. All of this, coupled with the current state of the economy, has driven the desire to understand the needs of the market at a lower level of granularity.

What are some of those needs?

The shift has caused a need to create local assortments and inventory fulfillment that reacts to local needs. Most retailers’ existing processes and systems were developed to meet the needs of the average, not the individual, but in order to increase demand in today’s markets, the next step for retailers is to take on the challenge of localization.

What is the single biggest supply chain challenge facing retailers?

First, it’s important to recognize that consumers are less predictable than ever and buying patterns are changing and evolving faster than ever.

The single biggest challenge retailers are facing is aligning their offering to local market demand and supporting that proposition through their supply chain. Retailers are realizing that what happened this time last year is no longer relevant to their business. Grouping stores together because they perform similarly will only deliver average results, the devil is in the detail, and retailers cannot afford to ignore those details any longer.

How are retailers overcoming these obstacles?

Inventory is one of the most significant investments that a retailer makes, and, in many cases, this investment is a bet. The costs involved in placing inventory chips in the wrong place is substantial, so retailers are trying to get smarter about understanding where products are likely to sell and why. This does not mean better forecasting, but understanding how to deal with uncertainty.

This requires retailers to be more reactive to changes they are seeing, which in turn puts more pressure on the people, processes and systems. Retailers can achieve this by throwing people at the problem and focusing on a small area of the offering, but it is not a solution that will scale across the business without fundamentally addressing some over-simplifications that exist in the current process.

What can retailers do to better position themselves?

The current economic environment is a gift for the good retailer. It does them the service of highlighting the shortcomings of their supply network and giving them the opportunity to address them. This means removing assumptions from their processes, taking away simplifications and dealing with details. Retailers that embrace the fact that their customers have changed and will continue to change will be successful. They need to align their supply network with what customers are asking for now, not what the retailer assumed they were going to ask for, or what they asked for two weeks ago. Retailers need to have a holistic fulfillment process that reaches the length of the supply network, and it needs to be built around aligning the inventory investment with local market needs.

The retailers that address these issues will make it through this downturn and position themselves as strong, profitable, successful and reactive market leaders of the future.

Email Questions and Comments to: chris.allan@quantumretail.com

Read more: Chain Store Age

Be the first to like.